Civil War Sound Group Update

The group’s focus this week was threefold. We had finished, for the most part, putting together our sound word corpus. With that done, all members of the group began to learn how to use text scraping scripts to help streamline gathering the data and ensure that it is “clean” and accessible as possible.  The second facet of the group’s effort centered on outreach and establishing a public presence; one group member set up a Git Hub and Twitter account for the group. She also began to explore which web platforms would best serve to present our work and share it. Third, the group continued to study and research the battle itself through reading accounts of the battle, from both secondary and primary sources.

Finally, the group began to put together the project update presentation, creating and including a work plan, basic test data, and a concept for the project.

Civil War Sound Group

Scarlett Newman, personal update (2)

In the past week, we got a nice sized task out of the way. We took 9 popular fashion publications and recorded (in a shared spreadsheet) every major fashion designer that they covered/reviewed on their sites. Then, we’ll take the ten that were the most covered across the board and that’s how we’ll determine the ten that will be featured in our project. Next, we’re going to get the model rosters from those 10 shows, which will probably available to us on Models.com.

I’m really glad we got to meet with Ms. Tang last week because she really helped us narrow down a lot of the things we were up in the air about. Hopefully we’ll be able to correspond with her through our journey, as she seemed really interested in the project.

Nicola Certo, update #2

As we discussed last week, main goal this week was to focus on the collection of data. We work together to be effective, so I started to get in touch with Fashion Spot, to get information about some graphs they were showing, with percentages for fashion diversities during NYFW16.

It’s going to be manual but from what I was able to understand, agencies guarantee the access to their data in some situations, for articles and information online, so we could have the chance to ask to people with already prepared sheets.

I’m trying to design the logo for our website, since the issue we are presenting has the right characteristic to be something very socially interesting. Nothing decided yet because this week, for the data collection, we needed to analyze Editorial and Magazines online to select the 10 designers that will be shown in the project. I worked on T Magazine, V magazine and Vogue.
I’m still following online classes and tutorials for D3.

Diversity in NYFW (Group Post #2)

During last Week 4’s class session, our group presented to the class our project’s premise, team, and tentative project phases. We are grateful to have met with GC Digital Fellow Jennifer Tang during class, whose questions and observations regarding our project presentation helped us begin to establish more deliberate steps in collecting initial data and better articulate our project’s critical direction.

Before we can begin to analyze model data, we had to create a strategy for selecting the designers who employed these models according to how often a designer was covered during the most recent New York Fashion Week that occurred between February 11 – 18, 2016, by fashion magazines carrying weight in the industry. Between the three of us, we split up nine fashion magazines and created a To-do list on Basecamp to verify our progress. Designers covered have been collected on a Google spreadsheet inside of a shared Google folder on Google Drive.

Shoutout to Nico for making contact with a primary source for past NYFW data and to Scarlett for organizing a meeting with a group member from the New York City Fashion Index (NYCFI).

Alison Boldero

 

Necropolis – Group Post #2

During our last meeting we have identified more concretely our future steps to get the project done. Here listed the most important aspects:

  1. We shared all the information we gathered during the previous week
  2. After discussing the pros and cons, we have selected two potential cemeteries for the project: Shearith Israel (with 3 but small burial grounds all in Manhattan) and Prospect Cemetery in Jamaica, Queens (one site but bigger).
  3. With a very useful brainstorming we have identified the major categories of information we would like to gather and display on the website/project:
    1. Biographic details on people buried (names, dates, age, photo, epigraphy)
    2. Geolocation of the graves
      1. Identify technology needed
      2. rent a device
    3. Environment (cemetery, surroundings)
    4. Historical data
  4. We have developed a very rough calendar for the future
    1. 1st phase – Planning
      1. Contacting potential partner
      2. Find out what they have
      3. Visit the site
    2. 2nd phase – Research
      1. Create database
      2. Polishing data
    3. 3rd phase – Development
      1. Design project and its component
      2. Development
    4. 4th phase – Launch
  5. Division of tasks (keep evolving)
    1. Conn -> outreaching
    2. Lisa -> presentation and contacts, general manager
    3. Davide -> group post, research
    4. Taylor -> research on theoretical structure and design

Since Tuesday we have already received a few important news. Shearith Israel’s representatives seemed very welcoming and open to our propositions, which were very well phrased by Conn who also sent us many very instructive images of the Shearith Israel and Prospect sites. In addition, he is in contact with the Queens Historical Society and he received encouraging news also on the data available for the Prospect Cemetery in Queens.
Things are moving and you all will have a more concrete sense of the project next week with the very well-developed Lisa’s presentation.

Civil War Sound Personal Update- David Campmier

The group focused on searching out aides for creating and curating our project’s dataset. My part in this task was two-fold. One was to seek out a “corpus” of sound words which would help flesh out our keyword searches in the American Civil War: Letters and Diaries database. So far, no luck finding previously established bodies of words. This led us to trying to find tools to help us build a  sound corpus for our use and the use of other possible projects in the future. What I found were online dictionaries and thesauruses as well as searching through the sources themselves to look for the words that people in the 19th century used. My second task was to learn how to leverage the database to get us the most precise results possible and cut down on the work we need to do to generate our dataset.

-David Campmier

Civil War Sound Group Update

This week our group had two major tasks centered on creating and curating our dataset. The first was to search out a body of words related to sound which would help us broaden and define the keywords we will use to draw out the sources for the sound events on the first day at the battle. Thus far we have not found a previously created work. This means that we have find tools to create this word list. The whole group worked, and is continuing to work on this particular task. The second task was to learn text scrapping to help to automate the data gathering process and thus save time while working with the data. We had one member begin the process of learning it because she will be responsible for that portion of working with the dataset. We also began to discuss a timeline for the work plan, one which would fit the timeline for the semester

Civil War Sound Project Group

Necropolis: mapping historical cemeteries

This is a complex project with the potential to go in several different directions.  At this point, we are still in the process of defining project goals, given these choices. To a large extent, what we do will depend on the site we choose (but establishing that partnership will depend on what we describe doing) so it’s a bit of a catch-22.

We expect to make contact with the congregations/organizations that manage the prospective sites this coming week. In the mean time, our team has been communicating on Basecamp about what we’d like to achieve, and providing reference material to each other, to better articulate what we imagine creating.  Everyone has been extremely thoughtful and detailed in their responses to my initial questions about how they see the project in relation to the original proposal. I’ve set a deadline, with tasks, for identifying and establishing a site partnership with a local cemetery: March 6. Between then and now, I think we will need to discuss in more detail our personal wishes for this project, and see where they overlap, in order to develop a clear goal we can all begin working toward. (Understanding, of course, that the project will probably end up looking different from even the hybridized version.)

At this point, I am acting as the PM, Conn is doing outreach, and Davide and Taylor are beginning to develop a theoretical structure that goes beyond “purpose.”  (Conn and I are throwing in our two cents on this as well.) For the time being  we will keep to this arrangement, and revisit it once we are deeper into the project’s development.IMG_0120

Report Back from Git and GitHub training by the GC Digital Fellows

On Tuesday evening, February 23rd, Mary Catherine Kinniburgh and Patrick Smyth taught a workshop on Collaboration and Writing Workflows with Git and GitHub. The workshop page is here. Follow the directions for signing up with GitHub and downloading Git on your computer. From there, follow the workshop here. There are explanations for the differences between Git (local repository) and GitHub (remote hosting service), glossary, and instructions on how to get started.

Mary Catherine and Patrick made this an excellent introduction to learning Git and GitHub workflows. Group learning provided a great opportunity to practice collaborative work.